home
***
CD-ROM
|
disk
|
FTP
|
other
***
search
/
InfoMagic Standards 1994 January
/
InfoMagic Standards - January 1994.iso
/
inet
/
ietf
/
idpr
/
92nov.min
< prev
next >
Wrap
Text File
|
1993-02-17
|
6KB
|
142 lines
Editor's Note: Minutes received 11/24/92
CURRENT_MEETING_REPORT_
Reported by Martha Steenstrup/BBN
Minutes of the Inter-Domain Policy Routing Working Group (IDPR)
At the November 1992 IETF meeting, the IDPR Working Group met for two
consecutive sessions during the afternoon of Monday the 16th. The first
session was a working meeting, while the second session was conducted as
an overview for newcomers. We organized the first session as follows:
1. General Status Report
o The IESG and IAB accepted the IDPR architecture and protocol
documents as Proposed Standards in August 1992.
o SRI is expecting to implement a large part of the IDPR MIB.
o Rob Austein has designed the the DNS changes (address to domain
identifier mapping queries and responses) required for IDPR.
o We are seeking eager volunteers to produce an independent
implementation of IDPR.
2. Gated version of IDPR
Woody Woodburn of Sparta led the gated implementation effort, with
additional participation by BBN. SRI is presently using the gated
version of IDPR as the basis for policy routing in a network for
one of their clients. Currently, SRI and BBN are taking
responsibility for the IDPR gated software. We will eventually
turn over the gated version of IDPR to Cornell, but before doing
so, we need to ensure that the software:
o Conforms to the protocol specification.
o Has clear and complete documentation.
o Has been tuned to provide good performance.
We welcome all those interested in working on the IDPR gated
software or in developing their own IDPR implementations. Please
send a message to idpr-wg@bbn.com, if you're interested in working
on IDPR software development.
3. Planned Internet Pilot Installation
The target date is February 1993. The installation will initially
include three backbone domains (NSFnet, NSInet, and TWBnet) and
four source domains. We will exercise both source and transit
policies. This will give transit service providers a chance to
observe IDPR in action. The results of the pilot installation,
including ease of use and management, general performance, and any
problems encountered, will be published as an Internet-Draft.
1
4. Policy Survey
The policies initially available with IDPR were extrapolated from a
survey of federal agencies conducted several years ago. As IDPR
moves from the testbed to the Internet, we should reevaluate the
policy support provided. We intend to conduct a systematic survey
of users and transit service providers to determine what types of
source and transit policies are most desired. Results of this
survey will be folded back into the policy offerings within IDPR.
Anyone interested in helping to conduct the survey, please respond
to the idpr-wg mailing list.
5. Multicast IDPR
To provide multicast support in an internetwork in which policy is
important, one cannot leave the forwarding decisions to
intermediate routers. Rather multicast distribution should be
defined by the source, just as it is for unicast distribution. To
provide multicast support within IDPR, we plan to make the
following modifications to IDPR:
o All multicast groups of which hosts within a domain are members
will be distributed as part of the existing routing information
messages for the domain. This information will be used by a
source to generate a multicast tree to other members of a
multicast group.
o The path identifier will carry a special multicast bit
indicating that it is a multicast packet. All paths in a
multicast tree will carry the same path identifier.
o One or more path setup packets will be used to set up the
multicast tree in sections or all at once. Each intermediate
policy gateway in a path must keep track of all of the
destination domains in the multicast tree that are reachable
through the subtree of which it is the root.
o The source will be notified through a teardown message when all
hosts within a domain leave a the multicast group. The
teardown will only affect the portion of the tree set up to
that domain. A source should be able to initiate teardown to
selected destinations or to all destinations within a multicast
tree.
o Intra-domain multicast, when available, will be used in
conjunction with IDPR multicast.
In early 1993, we will distribute an Internet-Draft describing the
initial version of multicast routing for IDPR.
Attendees
Cengiz Alaettinoglu ca@cs.umd.edu
2
Ken Carlberg Carlberg@cseic.saic.com
Dilip Chatwani dilip@synoptics.com
Osmund de Souza osmund.desouza@att.com
Barbara Denny denny@erg.sri.com
Paul Griffiths griff@chang.austin.ibm.com
John Hedderman jjh@ans.net
Jonathan Hsu brenda@penril.com
Dwight Jamieson djamies@bnr.ca
Fong-Ching Liaw fong@eng.sun.com
Olli-Pekka Lintula olli-pekka.lintula@ntc.nokia.com
Peder Norgaard pcn@tbit.dk
John Scudder jgs@merit.edu
William Simpson Bill.Simpson@um.cc.umich.edu
Lansing Sloan ljsloan@llnl.gov
Frank Solensky solensky@andr.ub.com
Martha Steenstrup msteenst@bbn.com
Robert Woodburn woody@sparta.com
3